您好，登录后才能下订单哦！
密码登录
登录注册
点击 登录注册 即表示同意《亿速云用户服务条款》
这篇文章主要讲解了“.NET某消防物联网后台服务内存泄漏问题怎么解决”，文中的讲解内容简单清晰，易于学习与理解，下面请大家跟着小编的思路慢慢深入，一起来研究和学习“.NET某消防物联网后台服务内存泄漏问题怎么解决”吧！
去年十月份有位朋友从微信找到我，说他的程序内存要炸掉了。。。截图如下：
这个是甄别内存问题的第一步，通过 !address -summary 和 !eeheap -gc 两个命令基本就可以断定。
0:000> !address -summary Mapping file section regions... Mapping module regions... Mapping PEB regions... Mapping TEB and stack regions... Mapping heap regions... Mapping page heap regions... Mapping other regions... Mapping stack trace database regions... Mapping activation context regions... --- Usage Summary ---------------- RgnCount ----------- Total Size -------- %ofBusy %ofTotal Free 237 7ffc`1e222000 ( 127.985 TB) 99.99% <unknown> 594 3`b9b20000 ( 14.901 GB) 95.96% 0.01% Heap 370 0`12a2a000 ( 298.164 MB) 1.88% 0.00% Image 1248 0`0ee5a000 ( 238.352 MB) 1.50% 0.00% Stack 315 0`06780000 ( 103.500 MB) 0.65% 0.00% Other 13 0`001d7000 ( 1.840 MB) 0.01% 0.00% TEB 105 0`000d2000 ( 840.000 kB) 0.01% 0.00% PEB 1 0`00001000 ( 4.000 kB) 0.00% 0.00% --- Type Summary (for busy) ------ RgnCount ----------- Total Size -------- %ofBusy %ofTotal MEM_PRIVATE 1178 3`ce03d000 ( 15.219 GB) 98.00% 0.01% MEM_IMAGE 1409 0`0f6fd000 ( 246.988 MB) 1.55% 0.00% MEM_MAPPED 59 0`04694000 ( 70.578 MB) 0.44% 0.00% --- State Summary ---------------- RgnCount ----------- Total Size -------- %ofBusy %ofTotal MEM_FREE 237 7ffc`1e222000 ( 127.985 TB) 99.99% MEM_COMMIT 2326 3`c7543000 ( 15.115 GB) 97.33% 0.01% MEM_RESERVE 320 0`1a88b000 ( 424.543 MB) 2.67% 0.00% 0:000> !eeheap -gc Number of GC Heaps: 1 generation 0 starts at 0x0000009902B57670 generation 1 starts at 0x0000009902A56810 generation 2 starts at 0x00000095318C1000 ephemeral segment allocation context: (0x0000009902D724A8, 0x0000009902D724C0) segment begin allocated committed allocated size committed size ... 00000098FFBE0000 00000098FFBE1000 0000009902D724A8 0000009902D7D000 0x31914a8(51975336) 0x319c000(52019200) Large object heap starts at 0x00000095418C1000 segment begin allocated committed allocated size committed size 00000095418C0000 00000095418C1000 00000095475D8D98 00000095475D9000 0x5d17d98(97615256) 0x5d18000(97615872) Total Allocated Size: Size: 0x398e6cbc8 (15450164168) bytes. Total Committed Size: Size: 0x398e7b000 (15450222592) bytes. ------------------------------ GC Allocated Heap Size: Size: 0x398e6cbc8 (15450164168) bytes. GC Committed Heap Size: Size: 0x398e7b000 (15450222592) bytes.
从输出信息看，好家伙。。。进程提交内存是 15G, 托管堆差不多也是 15G，这就说明当前是相对简单的 托管内存泄漏。
要想知道到底是什么在泄漏，可以先到托管堆上看看有没有什么异常的对象，使用 !dumpheap -stat 命令。
0:000> !dumpheap -stat Statistics: MT Count TotalSize Class Name ... 00007ff8815d0f88 7260233 290409320 System.Collections.ArrayList 00007ff8815e6830 7313696 326240826 System.String 000000952fbbd2b0 12141398 509369998 Free 00007ff880685cf0 7254983 928637824 System.Diagnostics.ProcessInfo 00007ff88065f7d0 7256845 2031916600 System.Diagnostics.Process 00007ff8815e6ea8 7391338 2230744600 System.Object[] 00007ff88068fa70 186800748 8966435904 System.Diagnostics.ThreadInfo
从卦象上来看，真的太奇怪了，如果大家了解 Process 类，应该知道 ProcessInfo 和 ThreadInfo 都是挂在 Process 下的，而且 ThreadInfo 对象高达 1.8亿，真的太????????了，看样子程序是在不断的做 Process.Start 操作吧。
接下来要探究的问题是 ThreadInfo 到底正在被谁持有？？？ 可以挑几个看看它们的 !gcroot， 首尾法查了几个，都是没有引用根，如下所示：
0:000> !gcroot 0000009531e8f760 Found 0 unique roots (run '!GCRoot -all' to see all roots). 0:000> !gcroot 0000009531e8f670 Found 0 unique roots (run '!GCRoot -all' to see all roots). 0:000> !gcroot 0000009531e8f378 Found 0 unique roots (run '!GCRoot -all' to see all roots).
既然对象没有引用根，为什么 GC 不回收它呢？ 这里就需要谈经验了，在我之前分析的很多关于内存泄漏 的dump中，我都是从 生产端 找问题，貌似还没有出现一个从 消费端 找问题的案例，参考模型如下：
生产者既然没问题，那消费端能有什么问题呢？大家可以想一想，托管堆的消费端起码有两个角色。
GC
Finalizer 线程
GC 肯定是不会出问题的,那就只能怀疑 Finalizer 线程出了什么问题，可以用 !t 命令把所有线程调出来看看。
0:000> !t ThreadCount: 9566 UnstartedThread: 0 BackgroundThread: 88 PendingThread: 0 DeadThread: 9471 Hosted Runtime: no Lock ID OSID ThreadOBJ State GC Mode GC Alloc Context Domain Count Apt Exception 0 1 40e18 000000952fbdfe50 26020 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0 STA 2 2 41ce8 000000952fc0e4d0 2b220 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0 MTA (Finalizer) 4 4 41cb4 000000954c324970 27220 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0 STA 5 5 41cb8 000000954c36d1e0 2027220 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0 STA 6 6 41c58 000000954c33f070 2027220 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0 STA 7 7 41c38 000000954c33f840 27220 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0 STA 8 8 41e0c 000000954c333580 27220 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0 STA 9 9 41e2c 000000954c354440 27220 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0 STA 10 10 41f24 000000954c355840 27220 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0 STA ... XXXX 9446 0 000000957a233410 8039820 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0 MTA (Threadpool Completion Port) XXXX 9447 0 0000009579f83e30 8039820 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0 MTA (Threadpool Completion Port) XXXX 9450 0 000000957a46dcf0 8039820 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0 MTA (Threadpool Completion Port) XXXX 9449 0 000000957967c6e0 8039820 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0 MTA (Threadpool Completion Port) XXXX 9448 0 000000957aee0010 8039820 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0 MTA (Threadpool Completion Port) XXXX 9452 0 00000095796824a0 8039820 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0 MTA (Threadpool Completion Port) XXXX 9451 0 000000957af05df0 8039820 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0 MTA (Threadpool Completion Port)
这不看不知道，一看吓一跳，当前进程有 9566 个，死线程高达 9471 个 ，以过往经验，这小子不用线程池，用 new Thread 咯, ???????????? ，吐槽结束，再看下 Finalizer 线程正在做什么,使用 ~2s & !dumpstack
0:002> ~2s ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xa: 00007ff8`8e220c8a c3 ret 0:002> !dumpstack OS Thread Id: 0x41ce8 (2) Current frame: ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xa Child-SP RetAddr Caller, Callee 0000009549e4e120 00007ff88b591118 KERNELBASE!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0x94, calling ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject 0000009549e4e1c0 00007ff88da3e334 combase!MTAThreadWaitForCall+0x54 [d:\9147\com\combase\dcomrem\channelb.cxx:5657], calling KERNELBASE!WaitForSingleObject 0000009549e4e210 00007ff88d8fe089 combase!MTAThreadDispatchCrossApartmentCall+0x75 [d:\9147\com\combase\dcomrem\chancont.cxx:193], calling combase!MTAThreadWaitForCall [d:\9147\com\combase\dcomrem\channelb.cxx:5619] 0000009549e4e240 00007ff88da3e13d combase!CRpcChannelBuffer::SendReceive2+0x64b [d:\9147\com\combase\dcomrem\channelb.cxx:4796], calling combase!MTAThreadDispatchCrossApartmentCall [d:\9147\com\combase\dcomrem\chancont.cxx:156] 0000009549e4e2b0 00007ff88e1bb6f7 ntdll!RtlAllocateHeap+0xd7, calling ntdll!RtlpLowFragHeapAllocFromContext ... 0000009549e4f5d0 00007ff8827d79cd clr!ManagedThreadBase_DispatchOuter+0x75, calling clr!ManagedThreadBase_DispatchMiddle 0000009549e4f5e0 00007ff8828601af clr!EEConfig::GetConfigDWORD_DontUse_+0x3b, calling clr!EEConfig::GetConfiguration_DontUse_ 0000009549e4f660 00007ff8828574fa clr!FinalizerThread::FinalizerThreadStart+0x10a, calling clr!ManagedThreadBase_DispatchOuter 0000009549e4f6a0 00007ff8827d55b9 clr!EEHeapFreeInProcessHeap+0x45, calling kernel32!HeapFreeStub 0000009549e4f700 00007ff882882e8f clr!Thread::intermediateThreadProc+0x86 0000009549e4f780 00007ff882882e6f clr!Thread::intermediateThreadProc+0x66, calling clr!_chkstk 0000009549e4f7c0 00007ff88dcd13d2 kernel32!BaseThreadInitThunk+0x22 0000009549e4f7f0 00007ff88e2003c4 ntdll!RtlUserThreadStart+0x34
从堆栈信息看，原来是终结器线程卡死了，从 MTAThreadDispatchCrossApartmentCall方法看，貌似是 MTA 向 STA 做了一个调用，到这里有经验的朋友应该知道，这和 com 组件有关系了，也就是说 Finalizer 线程无法释放由 STA 线程创建的 COM 对象，那到底是哪一个线程创建了没有被合理释放的 COM 组件呢？
说实话，这个对COM组件不了解的话，很难找出答案，但天无绝人之路，当我回头看 线程列表 的时候，发现居然有 38 个 STA线程，截图如下：
这里面肯定有问题，接下来抽一个线程看看调用栈如何。
0:004> !clrstack OS Thread Id: 0x41cb4 (4) Child SP IP Call Site 000000954da1ee38 00007ff88e220c8a [HelperMethodFrame: 000000954da1ee38] System.Threading.Thread.SleepInternal(Int32) 000000954da1ef30 00007ff88138c20a *** WARNING: Unable to verify checksum for mscorlib.ni.dll System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(Int32) 000000954da1ef60 00007ff82322437f xxx.CFileLogTask.DoWork() 000000954da1f160 00007ff8232234d6 xxx.CTask.InitStart() 000000954da1f240 00007ff8813c31d3 System.Threading.ExecutionContext.RunInternal(System.Threading.ExecutionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback, System.Object, Boolean) 000000954da1f310 00007ff8813c3064 System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(System.Threading.ExecutionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback, System.Object, Boolean) 000000954da1f340 00007ff8813c3032 System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(System.Threading.ExecutionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback, System.Object) 000000954da1f390 00007ff8813bc812 System.Threading.ThreadHelper.ThreadStart() 000000954da1f5e8 00007ff8827d6bb3 [GCFrame: 000000954da1f5e8] 000000954da1f938 00007ff8827d6bb3 [DebuggerU2MCatchHandlerFrame: 000000954da1f938]
接下来反编译下 xxx.CFileLogTask.DoWork() 方法看看它是如何被 Thread 执行的。
到这里终于水落石出，罪魁祸首在 CurrThread.SetApartmentState(ApartmentState.STA); 这一句上，我也不知道为啥开个 Thread 还要给个 STA。。。
感谢各位的阅读，以上就是“.NET某消防物联网后台服务内存泄漏问题怎么解决”的内容了，经过本文的学习后，相信大家对.NET某消防物联网后台服务内存泄漏问题怎么解决这一问题有了更深刻的体会，具体使用情况还需要大家实践验证。这里是亿速云，小编将为大家推送更多相关知识点的文章，欢迎关注！
免责声明：本站发布的内容（图片、视频和文字）以原创、转载和分享为主，文章观点不代表本网站立场，如果涉及侵权请联系站长邮箱：is@yisu.com进行举报，并提供相关证据，一经查实，将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。